0:02 Okay, I think we're about ready to go now. This is Strange Normal, and we're having a little bit of a conflict with streaming tonight, but we got it going. I want to tell you, we got a really good night coming up, and we are going to be talking a little bit about the WEF, the World Economic Forum that happened just recently in Davos, and this is very interesting how this happened because there's a lot being said that's not completely being said, if you know what I mean. We're also going to talk a little bit about different entertainment. George Lucas, James Cameron, Billy Corgan, and how that all ties into the World Economic Forum. It does. We're going to dig further into Elon Musk's and what did the President of Canada just say, and how did he just dig at Donald Trump without actually saying anything? That and more are coming right up. Stay tuned. The system is totally rigged and broken. The atmosphere is willful.
1:23 He carried himself to be inhabitants of five distant planets in the galaxies that are going to be destroyed. They're coming to warn the inhabitants of planet Earth of the impending destruction of the planet. It is now 89 seconds to midnight. This is the closest the world has ever been. I still think these are what people call angels. I'm dying to know what they've got to say. Pretty severe suffering brings them. These entities have the ability to appear in any form. Welcome to Strange Normal.
2:46 My name is Bradley. We talk about the stranger things that happen in your normal life to give you a biblical understanding of what is going on, and there's a lot. So make sure you hit the subscribe button, hit that little bell icon, so you're notified when things like this happen. Folks, we got a lot to talk about tonight, and we're going to start right into it, talking about Billy Corgan. Corgan? Am I saying that right? He was a little bit before I got really into music, and so Smashing Pumpkins was his group, and we're going to also talk a little bit about George Lucas, James Cameron. What is going on with them, and how does the WEF, or the World Economic Forum, how does that tie all into this? We're going to get into that. So what's the most terrifying thing that has been said at the World Economic Forum? Well, it's basically how this world is being led right now and showing what's going on and how you can say very mean things without actually even saying anything about a specific leader.
3:40 The world is coming apart at the seams. That's what essentially is happening here. And just so you guys know, I wish you could see, because I had to reboot and change all this stuff, I can't see what I'm looking at anymore, but I'm going to try to get that fixed as soon as I bring up this first clip here. And so I'm talking blind. Let me see if we can get this rolling. And here we go. Watch this. You'll be surprised at what the leader of Smashing Pumpkins just said about his time when he was on top of the whole thing and going to the White House because he was such a popular entertainer. Tie this into the whole Blink-182 guy and how he's pushing this alien agenda, right now, and you'll see what I mean. Just listen to this. At different times, I've been approached by elements of the U.S. government to be involved in things that were just way above my pay grade. I've never talked about them in any depth publicly, but I've had experiences where I would find myself in a room with people and think, why are they talking to me?
4:38 It was something out of, like, Eyes Wide Shut. Really? Oh, yeah. And what did they say? I'm not going to tell you. Okay. All I can say is I've experienced supernatural things and I've experienced things where I've had elements of the U.S. government reach out to me because they... somehow want to hook my influence, which is not that great, into whatever they're after. So, having had personal experience of this, and, of course, there's lots of other insinuations, and I certainly would say, sitting here quite openly, it seems very, very obvious to me that there are elements in popular music where people have been compromised knowingly because they were offered kind of a Faustian bargain. Pick door number one and we're going to push you to the moon because in music, and this is certainly my area of expertise, there are people who are protected. All right, before we get into those people that are protected, this was fascinating to me because what is he saying here? Well, he's essentially saying, hey, look, I've been involved with these people and it seems that there's very high up people that are telling me, hey, we need you to push an agenda in your music and this is called propaganda.
5:41 When I was in college, I took the highest, you know, fourth level writing course. It was a senior level writing course in college and I... I fortunately got into the class that lets you just watch things and write about it and you didn't have to come up with your own topic. They just taught you things and you wrote about it. It was the easiest writing class I had ever been to. But one of the things that they taught, which I was floored by, is that this propaganda has been around for a long time. In fact, they push this stuff into media all the time. And so everyone who goes through communication and has a bachelor's or even an associate's degree in this, knows that, hey, every once in a while, we're going to have the government or leadership come in and say, eh, we're going to help you out with this. We want you to push this agenda and we'll incentivize it.
6:32 How is that any different than China, which is kind of pushes the agenda? Well, this is how it's different. You don't have an... You have an option, kind of, with the United States. Well, with other dictatorships, you don't really. They'd say, if you don't do this, we're going to come in with inspectors and shut you down. You got to give everything over to us. So listen to what he's saying here. This is really interesting. And they get every benefit of that protection. And I know it because I know the game, because I've lived it. And there are other people where they just, they decide to press a button and throw them off the ship. Now, it might be because they're engaging in bad behavior. And we talked a little bit about that. But in other cases, I think just because they won't do the bidding that people want them to do. You can believe me or you can't. But I can say sitting here that I've been in the room with some of the most famous people in the world. I've been, you know, invited to a meeting with some of the most famous people in the world. I've been, you know, invited to a meeting with some of the most famous people in the world. I've been invited to the White House two times to have meetings that were, you know, essentially off-the-record meetings.
7:26 Why? So if you want to call me crazy or wacky or talk about my, you know... Can you say which presidency this was? It was during the Bush administration. Oh, wow. And I'm not a Republican. So that was even more shocking to me. I grew up in a blue state. Isn't that interesting? So he's saying, yeah, you know, when... And that's the era that he was very popular was in this era, this time period. So think about the current entertainers of your generation. So think about the current entertainers of your generation. Hollywood, media, Hollywood, or music, I mean. Who are the ones on the top level right now? Those are the ones that are currently meeting with the president and they're pushing an agenda. And what is that agenda? Well, you can see it all throughout Hollywood. Anytime they have anything about the war or military in Hollywood, it's always incentivizing, hey, we're so great, we're wonderful.
8:16 And that goes around the world to make the United States look great. But that's what he said. He said, look, this is what we push. And he's not the only one that has said that. There has been many throughout history. But these are the few clips that I have that are most recent that have been pushed out. How does this tie into World Economic Forum? You'll see in just a second. First, I'm going to show you this next clip is of George Lucas and James Cameron discussing Star Wars and the propaganda behind it. Yeah. Floored stuff. The good guys are the rebels? They're using asymmetric warfare against a highly organized empire? I think we call those guys terrorists today. We call them Mujahideen. We call them Al-Qaeda. When I did it, they were Viet Cong. Exactly.
9:04 So were you thinking of that at the time? So it was a very anti-authoritarian, very kind of 60s, against the man kind of thing nested deep inside of a fantasy. Or a colonial, you know, we're fighting the largest empire, and we're just a bunch of hayseeds in coonskin hats who don't know nothing. That's right. And it was the same thing with the Vietnamese. The irony of that one is in both of those, the little guys won. And the big, highly technical empire... The English Empire. The English Empire, the American Empire, lost. That was the whole point. But that's a classic us not profiting from the lesson of history because you look at the inception of this country, and it's very, it's a very noble f**k. We're going to be shut down for doing this. So I'm just going to continue because I can get this taken care of.
10:00 But right now, I'm going to get a lot of chats that say, hey, we're not streaming anymore right now. I'm going to just say this. We're coming back. But obviously, demonic entities don't want me to get this out, and they're using this as something. We're going to shut down the stream until you put yourself back up on the stream because we think that you're just airing this as propaganda. I'm not. I'm not airing. I'm going to get this cut out too because what's going on here is an agenda of media propaganda. Still waiting for this thing to say that we're cleared on my stream here. And then I'm going to throw this back in, and you can see the rest of it. Maybe I'll just let you see the second half in a little bit because it's still... It'll give me a heads-up warning that they've detected someone else's stuff.
10:59 But this is what's happening. So why is this WEF, this World Economic Forum, so important? And what's that all about? Let me come back to James Cameron. Is it his name? Yeah, James Cameron and George Lucas in a second. Because are you guys familiar with Dario and Dimas? These two are... Dimas? Dimas. I can never say their name correctly. But they are the two behind this Google AI and Anthropic, I think, AI. They did a thing together, and they told everybody where their inspiration comes from. Guess where their inspiration... It wasn't Star Wars, but guess where their inspiration comes from. Watch this. You know, there's this scene from Carl Sagan's Contact, the movie version of it. And ever since I saw it, it was like 20 years ago, I think I saw that movie. It's kind of stuck. It's stuck with me. And that's the frame that I used, which is that, you know, we are knocking on the door of these incredible capabilities, right?
12:02 Actually, Contact is one of my favorite films as well. So, funnily enough, I didn't realize it was yours too, Dario. So, get this. Two guys, separate companies, focused on the same principle, making AI better for all of humanity, and their focus, and their entertainment, their favorite movie was both Contact. Well, it's interesting, because I think that there's a lot, and we've seen that throughout this, a few episodes ago, that there was a lot of scientists that are out there. Their favorite program, their favorite movie is Contact. Contact. What is that contacting? Well, it's contacting another world out there. There has to be aliens. If we could only talk to them, and that's exactly what's going to happen, folks, because we were told by former occultists that demons, spirits from here are basically going to say, hey, we're from a long ways away.
12:57 We've come to this planet to tell you about the impending destruction of the planet unless something proper is done to avoid it. That's what they've said. Who is that? Roger Morneau. Look him up. There's a three and a half hour video where he did it in the 80s, I believe, talking about that. Very interesting stuff. So, let's look real quick at Elon Musk. Does he have any propaganda that has influenced him as well? Surely it has, and he's said, he said that at the World Economic Forum, too. Listen to this. Yeah, I was inspired by reading books about the future, about science fiction, and I guess I want to make science fiction not fiction forever, at some point, turn science fiction to science fact. We want to have Starfleet and Star Trek, really, for real. Oh, so, okay. And he goes on and on and talks about that. We're going to show the whole clip here in a moment, but essentially, my point is, all these big, wealthy leaders right now are all influenced by media.
14:01 So, if anybody ever comes to you and says, well, is art mimicking life, or is life mimicking art? Yeah, it's a little bit of both, but far, far more often does life mimic art. And I think the devil knows that, and I think that's why Hollywood is so corrupt. So, now that you know the direction of this program, well, I just want to show you, if you don't know what Contact is, this was a clip from Contact trailer where she gets into this thing and she goes, not somewhere, but, well, in her head, she does. And it's this thing where she meets her father, but it's not her father because they came in the form of her father as a dead relative to give her a message. And they explicitly say that in this film. We came to tell you something and we came in the form of your dead relative so that we can, you know, present it to you and you would accept it easier.
14:57 This is a favorite film of our leaders. Kind of creepy, huh? So, let's go straight into the program. This is Nereo, or excuse me, this is not, this is, let me let her introduce. It's Yuval Noah Harari. He's a common speaker at the World Economic Forum, but he has some very interesting things to say about AI, and where that's going. And he's not too happy about it. Some of the things he said, we'll talk a little bit about. Watch this. He is a distinguished research fellow at the University of Cambridge at the Center for the Study of Existential Risk. He has been a lecturer in the Department of History at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. And he is co-founder of Sapienship.
15:49 As many of you will know, he is a best-selling author, selling over 50,000 copies, over 50 million books worldwide in 65 languages. He focuses on the macro-historical questions of our time. All right, so that was the intro to who he is. Are these things, he's going to write a little bit about it, but he's a well-known author, and he's kind of the entertainment of the leaders. In other words, a lot of leaders read a lot of books, right? If you're reading, you're leading. That's the whole idea behind this. And this is one of the guys that is, is well received by leadership. So what is he saying about AI? Because he just wrote about it, and he's going to talk about it a little bit. The most important thing to know about AI is that it is not just another tool. It is an agent.
16:43 It can learn and change by itself and make decisions by itself. A knife is a tool. You can use that. use a knife to cut salad or to murder someone, but it is your decision what to do with the knife. AI is a knife that can decide by itself whether to cut salad or to commit murder. One big open question about AI is whether it can think. Modern philosophy began in the 17th century when René Descartes proclaimed, I think, therefore I am. Even before Descartes, we humans defined ourselves by our capacity to think. We believe we rule the world because we can think better than anyone else on this planet. If thinking really means putting words and other language to use, then AI is a knife that can decide whether to cut salad or to commit murder. In order, then AI can already think much better than many, many humans. AI can certainly come up with a sentence like AI thinks.
18:53 Therefore, AI am. Some people argue that AI is just glorified autocomplete. It barely predicts the next word in a sentence. But is that so different from what the human mind is doing? Try to observe, to catch the next word that pops up in your mind. Do you really think AI is a knife that can decide whether to cut salad or to commit murder? Do you really know why you saw that word, where it came from? Why did you think this particular word and not some other word? Do you know? As far as putting words in order is concerned, AI already thinks better than many of us. Therefore, anything made of words will be taken over by AI. All right, so let's think about that for a second. What he's saying is, hey, leaders, anything that's going to be using words is going to be taken over by AI because they use them so well. This is an author. He knows words. That's his job is to put words in order. And he's probably feeling the trauma of this right now going, look, it took my job. It's going to take my job. I see what's happening here. And I believe that it's coming for you next. So let's think of things real quick.
20:21 What could be significant that AI could take that uses words? Well, there are things like laws. Laws are words. Religion. Religion's words. Books, authoring, those are words. But can they take laws? I mean, can they take religion? I'm going to disagree with that. Let's see what he says in this next clip here. If laws are made of words, then AI will take over the legal system. If books are just combinations of words, then AI will take over books. If religion is built from words, then AI will take over religion. This is particularly true of religions based on books, like Islam, Christianity, or Judaism.
21:20 Judaism calls itself the religion of the book, and it grants ultimate authority, not to humans, but to words in books. So, I'm watching the chat here, and people are saying, he's a creepy human. He's a bad guy. He's an evil man. How do you know this guy? I mean, what is, tell me in the chat, what is it that makes him a unique character? I think it is interesting what he's saying. I don't know any background on him, other than that he spoke, he speaks at this World Economic Forum quite a bit. And folks, don't get me wrong. I think that this is a very important thing to think about, but the World Economic Forum is a meeting of the minds. It might be, I mean, think about the conventions for a second. Go to the conventions in your head that you've been to.
22:09 The General Conference, perhaps, if you're from my church. That's not an evil thing, right? But it's a meeting of the minds. Did you know that at most conferences, what happens, during the services that are out there, things that happen during the services, are what the audience sees. But also there's private meetings that happen with leadership underneath for the pushing of an agenda. Because, hey, we're all here anyway. Why don't we get together and talk about and present what's happening to each other so we are better aligned and can make everything flow according to what we have as an agenda. That happens at every conference, whether it be a global one, a World Economic Conference, the meeting of all the big things, Chase Bank CEOs and the leaders of countries meeting at this thing. I'm sure there are, I'm not going into conspiracy here.
23:05 This is legit. There are meetings that happen that aren't broadcasted. We're just seeing what's being planned and presented at the surface level of these things. This isn't a conspiracy, but this is interesting what he has to say about this. So let's hear more about these words. What other words does he have to say? Throughout history, people have always struggled with the tension between word and flesh, between the truth that can be expressed in words and the absolute truth, which is beyond words. Previously, this tension was internal to humanity. It was between different human groups. Some humans gave supreme importance to words. They've been willing, for example, to abandon or even kill their gay son just because of a few words in the Bible.
24:07 Other humans have said, but these are just words. The spirit of love should be much more important than the letter of the law. Oh, man. See how he's interweaving some religion into this now? This is really wracking people's brains right now. What is truth, essentially? This is what he's saying right now. He's Pilate. Well, you know, these are just words. Well, you know who was word? Who became flesh? Who was the word and became flesh? Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ is the truth. He was the word that became flesh, the truth. The true word. And so, think about this for a second. He's kind of disassembling the whole idea of truth in this aspect, saying, you know, what is love?
25:01 What is the spirit of love? Did he talk about that yet? I don't remember, but I wrote in my notes to talk about the spirit of love a little bit. Think about what true love is, because it's not a feeling that goes out. It's a duty that brings a feeling. If you've been on my program, or if you've listened to Strange Normal, any time, you've known that I say this over and over again. How do I know that? Well, look deeply at this. Did Jesus Christ, did he want to die for you? Initially, you're just like, oh yeah, he's God. He wanted to die for me. In the Garden of Gethsemane, what did he do? He pleaded not to die for you. But he said, not my will, yours, God, the Father. Be done. And it was done. Why? Because that's the ultimate show of love, is to give up something for someone else to the extent of death.
25:54 That's the ultimate. I mean, you can give up your blanket if you're cold, your coat if you're cold, or if someone else is cold. You can give up your shoes if they don't have anything. You've sacrificed something for yourself for somebody else. That's love. But what's the ultimate love? The duty that gives your life away for someone else. This is a little object lesson, but recently there was a news story about, I believe it was a tandem skydiver, that something happened. They got caught on the door of the plane, and they got unhooked. The person that wasn't supposed to have, that was in tandem with them, that didn't have the license to dive, they had the parachute somehow, or the extra parachute connected. And the other guy didn't. I don't have the whole story. You can look this up. It happened recently.
26:48 But due to that, the guy, the trainer, the guy who was taking the person out tandemly, he said, cut me loose, otherwise we both die. He sacrificed his life for the other person, even though he might have not known him. It was the ultimate gift of love. That's love. And it's not this love, not a feeling that words can present on a screen. You understand what I'm saying here? So let's continue to hear what else he has to say about this. If we continue to define ourselves by our ability to think in words, our identity will collapse. All this means that no matter from which country you come, your country will soon face a severe identity crisis and also an immigration crisis. The immigrants this time will not be human beings coming in fragile boats without a visa.
27:51 Or trying to cross a border in the middle of the night. The immigrants will be millions of AIs that can write love poems better than us, that can lie better than us, and that can travel at the speed of light without any need of visas. Like human immigrants, these AI immigrants will bring various benefits with them. We will have AI doctors to help in our healthcare systems, AI teachers, to help in our education systems. Even AI border guards to stop illegal human immigrants. And now we can finally come to the question each one of you must soon answer. Will your country recognize the AI immigrants as legal persons? Will you recognize the AI persons as legal persons?
28:50 Well, I think his point is interesting, isn't it? Because he says if you're going to allow other things to sue, to have bank accounts, to do things, even though there's someone else behind the scenes pulling strings, what happens when we have other things that come up on the screen or up in life here that say, well, my daughter, she wants to date this AI. Why? Because they're going to oppose their given bodies. Are you going to allow that? Are you going to allow that? Leaders, this is what we're going to come up against. This is what we have to think about. This is how we have to do this today to think about. Are you going to allow your daughters and your sons to communicate and have friends with other AI on social media? He said, this is not a question for the future. This is a question for the past. This is a question for the past because we already have AI bots that are on Twitter. Or X and all these other places that are friending your people right now. And you think that they're part of you.
29:57 I lost everything on my screen. Let's see if I can bring it back. Something got disconnected here. There we go. All right. So we identify the crisis and will you allow AI religions? That's what's coming next, he says. Suppose some AI persons create a new religion which gains the faith of millions of people. That should not sound too far fetched because after all, almost all religious religions in history have claimed that they were created by a nonhuman intelligence. Now, will your country extend freedom of religion to the new AI sect and to it's AI priests and missionaries? Maybe we should start with something a bit simpler.
30:48 Will your country allow AI priests and missionaries to build a new religion? Will your country allow AI priests and missionaries to build a new religion? Will your country allow AI priests and missionaries to build a new religion? AI persons to open social media accounts, enjoy freedom of speech on Facebook, on TikTok, and befriend real children? Well, of course, that question should have been asked 10 years ago. On social media, AI bots have been operating as functional persons for at least a decade. If you think AIs should not be treated as persons on social media, you should have acted 10 years ago. 10 years from now, it will be too late for you to decide whether AIs should function as persons in the financial markets, in the courts, in the churches. Somebody else will already have decided it for you.
31:42 If you want to influence where humanity is going, you need to make a decision now. So, what is your answer as a leader? Do you think the AI immigrants should be recognized as legal persons? If not, how are you going to stop that? Thank you for listening to this human. Thank you for listening to this human. So, thank you for listening to this human. Well, it's an interesting proposition, but its basis, I think, is flawed. You can't start with thesis and say, well, I think that all AI is human, is alive. Because I think what we as a government need to decide is, how do you prove AI isn't really intelligent?
32:34 How do you prove that it's not human? Once you separate that and you stop all this chaos from saying that AI is... It's alive, then you're going to stop all this nuts that's going to happen afterwards that says, oh, you can't turn it off. Oh, it's alive. Oh, what are you doing? It needs rights. You can't kill it. It doesn't have a soul. Don't... The soul, in other words, it doesn't have the breath that comes in to its body to make it something that is worth saving. I'm going to leave it there. But I think it would be good to actually hear from these guys who are creating the AI. Now, are they already thinking about this? What are they actually thinking about? This is the beginning, the beginning of Dario and Dimas, as they talk about from Anthropic and Google DeepMinds, as they talk to Jillian Tett, who is the editor-at-large of the Financial Times.
33:29 This is what they said. I think, I don't know, we might be six to 12 months away from when the model is doing most, maybe all of what SWEs do end-to-end. Right. And it's a question of how fast does that loop close? Not every part of that loop is something that can be sped up by AI, right? There's like chips, there's manufacture of chips, there's training time for the model. So it's, you know, I think there's a lot of uncertainty. It's easy to see how this could take a few years. I don't, it's very hard for me to see how it could take longer than that. But if I had to guess, I would guess that this goes faster than people imagine, that that key element of code, and increasingly research, going faster than we imagine. Going faster than we can imagine. So that's what, this is Dario, I believe it's Dario, the founder of Anthropic, or is this the other guy? No, this is Dario, Anthropic guy. And he's saying this. He's saying, look, this is how fast this thing can progress.
34:35 And he said, what we need to watch is when the AIs start building themselves, because then it can change. It can just, it can take off, like, nonstop. He also goes and talks a little bit about how we can make sure the nations don't misuse this stuff. So I think the next few years, we're going to be dealing with, you know, how do we keep these systems under control that are highly autonomous and smarter than any human? How do we make sure that individuals don't misuse them, right? I have worries about things like bioterrorism. How do we make sure that nation states don't, don't misuse them? That's why I've been so concerned about, you know, the CCP, other authoritarian, authoritarian governments. What are the economic impacts, right? I've talked about labor displacement a lot. And, you know, what haven't we thought of, which in many cases, you know, may be the hardest thing to deal with at all.
35:29 So, you know, I'm thinking through how to address those risks. And, you know, for each of these, it's a mixture of things that we individually need to do as leaders of the companies. And that we can do working together. And then there's going to need to be some role for wider societal institutions like the, like the government in addressing all of these. Amanda just said, these nerds are going to kill us all. She's right. I started laughing right in the middle of that. You know, it's not past me to think that this whole thing could end up just like the entertainment media says. What does the entertainment media say? Skynet, you know, actually Elon Musk alludes to that after all. And he says, it's a great movie. It's a great movie. He says, I want you to just think about some of this stuff real quick. Entertainment. This is the premise of this whole show.
36:28 Entertainment, which we showed at the beginning, is influencing these guys to produce what they, what has been inspired by the entertainment industry. Is this biblical? Well, it has. It has been because think about all the music. I'm going to use music for entertainment because that was the main entertainment back then. Music. Samuel 16, 14 through 16 says, but the spirit of the Lord departed from Saul. Remember this? Saul was so taken aback by things and David would come and play his harp. And so spiritualism can have an influence through entertainment, right? For the good or for the bad. What about Daniel 3? Daniel 3, 4 through 7. And at that time, you hear the sound of the cornet, the flute, the harp, all kinds of music.
37:19 And they fell down and worshiped the image. Remember that? That was back in the time when they wanted to, the king wanted them to worship this idol. What did they use? They used the idol to bow down to. And they played all this music in order to do that. It lifted the heart and probably allowed these people to accept something to come into them. To encourage them to do these things. Exodus 32, 16 and 19. The people sat down and ate and drank and rose up to play. And Moses came down and they came nigh to the camp and he saw the calf and dancing. Also, all this stuff that was happening was happening with music. Not saying music is bad. Don't get me wrong. But I think it's interesting that oftentimes spiritualism is very connected to the entertainment that is around what we're doing. I think that's biblical. 1 Kings 10. 1 through 2. I can go on and on. Esther talks about it as well.
38:14 Esther 1, 10 through 12. 1 Kings 22, 10 through 12. Anyway, false prophets and power. I get a whole Bible study on this. But let's get back to the clips real quick. Let's hear from Demas from Google and what he has to say about the chance we have for a disruption in humanity. This is a big deal. This is something I've talked about. I'm going to tell you a little bit about that. It's after he says it. How big do you think is the risk of a popular backlash against AI that will somehow kind of cause governments to do what, from your perspective, might be stupid things? Because I'm just thinking back to the era of globalization in the 1990s when there was indeed some displacement of jobs. Governments didn't do enough. The public backlash was such that we've ended up sort of where we are now. Do you think that there is a risk that there will be a great...
39:11 There will be a growing antipathy towards what you are doing and your companies in the kind of body politic? I think there's definitely a risk. I think that's kind of reasonable. There's fear and there's worries about these things like jobs and livelihoods. I think there's a couple of things that, I mean, it's going to be very complicated the next few years, I think, geopolitically, but also the various factors here. Like we want to, and we're trying to do this with AlphaFold and our science work and Isomorphic, our spin-out company, solve all disease, cure diseases, come up with new energy sources. I think as a society, it's clear we'd want that. I think maybe the balance of what the industry is doing is not enough balance towards those types of activities. I think we should have a lot more examples, I know Dario agrees with me, of like AlphaFold-like things that help sort of unequivocal goods in the world. And I think actually it's incumbent on the industry and all of us leading players to show that more, demonstrate that, not just talk about it, but demonstrate that. But then it's going to come with these other intended disruptions.
40:09 But I don't... I think the other issue is the geopolitical competition. There's obviously competition between the companies, but also US and China primarily. So unless there's an international cooperation or understanding around this, which I think would be good actually in terms of things like minimum safety standards for deployment, I think Dario would agree on that as well. I think it's vitally needed. This technology is going to be cross-border. It's going to affect everyone. It's going to affect all of humanity. It will. It will affect all of humanity. But I think what he said was very interesting there, because he got into... He got into the risk. He got into the risks of a disruption by humanity. So what does that mean? Well, in the past, in the 1900s, at the very beginning, there was a huge disruption in work and the humanity. They started burning down these buildings that had machines in them. Machines. Now we're talking about computer systems back then.
40:59 We're talking about machines with gears that would take over people's jobs. It was called the Industrial Revolution. Back then, there was a disruption because people were frustrated. They were frustrated by these things. He says there's a real potential for that to happen. I mean, this is in the back of everyone's head. And this is going to happen, folks. We're going to see people coming after data centers. They're going to see these things after it takes away their livelihoods. I have a whole sermon on that, talking about AI and how this whole thing comes together at the very end, because what the big problem with AI is, is yes... I mean, I get asked this question a lot when I go speak. How is AI... How is AI... A part of the demonic agenda? Well, it's not like you think. The whole part of AI is to bring a recession down so they can push people into enforcing certain rules about when you can work.
41:55 Think about that for a second. That's what happened at the beginning of the 19th... At the 20th... 20th century? Whatever. It was at the end of the 1800s. At the beginning of the 1900s. That's what was happening with the Industrial Revolution. That's what Pope Leo... Of back then was concerned about and started pressing for all these Sunday laws. The new Pope Leo has said the same thing. And he said, I took my name because I'm concerned that AI is the new Industrial Revolution. And we're going to have to deal with work ethic again. This is coming down the pipe. And so we got to think about that as well. So what's the last thing they talk about as far as risks? This is from, it says from Dario, but I don't think it's Dario. Here we go. How big do you think is the risk of a popular backlash against AI?
42:47 That was the duplicate. That's why. One more area for me, and then I hope we'll have time for a question or two. The other area of potential risk that doomers worry about is a kind of all-powerful malign AI. And I think you've both been somewhat skeptical of the doomer approach. But in the last year, we have seen, you know, these models showing themselves to be capable of, you know, deception, duplicity. Do you think that, do you think differently about that risk now than you did a year ago? And is there something about the way the models are evolving that we should put a little bit more concern on that? Yeah, I mean, you know, since the beginning of Anthropic, we've kind of thought about this risk. I mean, you know, our research at the beginning of it was very theoretical, right? You know, we pioneered this idea of mechanistic interpretability, which is looking inside the model and trying to understand, look, is there a risk?
43:36 Is there a risk? Looking inside its brain. Trying to understand why it does what it does as it, you know, as human neuroscientists, which we actually both have background in, try to understand the brain. And I think as time has gone on, we've increasingly documented the, you know, bad behaviors of the models when they emerge and are now working on trying to address them with mechanistic interpretability. So, you know, I think, you know, I've always been concerned about these risks. I've talked to Demis many times. I think he has also been. I'm concerned about these risks. I think I have definitely been, and I would guess Demis as well, although I'll let him speak for himself, skeptical of doomerism, which is, you know, we're doomed, there's nothing we can do, or this is the most likely outcome. I think this is a risk. This is a risk that if we were all work together, we can address. We can learn through science to properly, you know, control and direct these creations that we're building. But if we build them poorly, you know, we're not going to be able to do it. You know, we're not going to be able to do it. You know, we're not going to be able to do it. But if we build them poorly, if we go, you know, if we're all racing and we go so fast that there's no guardrails, then I think there is risk of something going wrong.
44:45 So let me get this straight. You base all of your data on bad novels and sinful people and people that make mistakes, and then you expect your AI not to make a mistake? I mean, there's a lot of religion based in this right now, because if you, they even say that if you introduce error into an AI. It's very difficult, very difficult to extract it out. You've got to retrain that thing. It's oh, it's so difficult to do. You know who can do it? You know who can take an intelligence and fix it? God. And that's the problem that we've had right now. You can't train an artificial intelligence on sinful humanity and not expect that it won't do something sinful. That's the problem. If you're going to teach it, if you're going to teach the truth, you've got to teach it without any material that is obviously lying.
45:41 Novels lying. It's going to, it's, it's trained off of the best, the best, uh, methods of deception. And you think it's not going to try to deceive you. There's so much, so much we can say about that, but let me, let me dive into this. Now, this is a speaking of all this technology that we've had. We also have, uh, Elon Musk creating the, uh, the tower of Babel. Because the tower of Babel's purpose was to try to get the people and save themselves from the next disaster that was going to come upon the world by God. Well, what is Elon Musk doing? He's saving humanity by pushing everyone into another planet to prevent any disasters from coming upon the earth. I think that's interesting, but anyway, he's going to talk a little bit about his technology and, uh, the extension of SpaceX. SpaceX is about both advancing rocket technology to the point where we can extend life and consciousness beyond earth, uh, to the moon, to Mars, uh, eventually to other star systems.
46:42 And, uh, I know, I think we should always view consciousness, uh, life as we know it as, as precarious and delicate, um, because to the best of our knowledge, we, we, we don't know if life anywhere else, you know, I'm often asked, um, are there aliens among us? And I'll say that I am one. Or you're from the future. They don't believe me. Okay. Um, so, uh, but I, I, I think if anyone would know if there are aliens among us, it would be me. Um, and, uh, we, we have 9,000 satellites up there and not once have we had to maneuver around an, uh, an alien spaceship. So I'm like, I don't know. Bottom line is, I think we need to assume that life and consciousness is extremely rare and it might only be us. And if that's the case, then we need to do everything possible to, to ensure that the, the light of can, the light of consciousness is not extinguished because we're effectively, we're, the way I view it is the image in my mind is of a tiny candle in a vast darkness, a tiny candle of consciousness that could easily go out.
48:02 And that's why it's important to make life multi-planetary. Um. such that if there is a natural disaster or a man-made disaster on Earth, that consciousness continues. That's the purpose of SpaceX. Yeah, exactly. The purpose of SpaceX is to save humanity. That's essentially what he's doing. Same thing. So, folks, that's not the last clip we have of this. We're going to go into a few others and talk a little bit about something else that happened, something very interesting with the Canadian president. But before we do, I want to tell you, look, we talk about this stuff more and more on our Discord server. Discord, you can access through patreon.com slash strangenormal. It's a private community where we talk about this stuff and we go into it every day.
48:49 We communicate back and forth daily, talking about and we push things out there that don't even get onto this program. We're only seeing the iceberg of the stuff that we discuss down in our Discord private community. If you want to be a part of that, we want to welcome you. We'd love to welcome you. So join us by going to patreon.com slash strangenormal. I'll put a link in the comments below. You should join us. It's a great place to be. And, by the way, we are also a nonprofit. We are pushing the agenda right now. Our goal with this nonprofit is to produce some books, produce some literature. We've got some books coming out that are very specific in guiding people and understanding the two main things that are going to be deceptions in the last days, which is Revelation 13. Talking about worship. How's that going to be? Number two, primarily talking about spiritualism. How is that going to happen? And so they aren't deceived. So if you want to help out with that, we appreciate you. You can go to strangenormal.org. We're also making a couple more websites.
49:49 We're up and announced here pretty soon with that income. And it's coming along really well. Folks, let's get back into the program. Things are happening. This is the last clip from Elon Musk. And we're going to talk a little bit about. Canada. Well, how would you describe success with AI or space technology? And where do you see it that can you are you more certain what's going to happen the next three years or five or ten? I don't know what's going to happen in ten years, but the rate at which AI is progressing, I think we're we might have AI that is smarter than any human by the end of this year. And I would say no later than next year. And then probably by 2030 or 2031, call it five years from now, AI will be smarter than all of humanity collectively.
50:51 We got something happening, folks, and it's going to be very fascinating what is going down the pipe here. So moving on, new topic. We're going to talk a little bit about Mr. Canada himself. This guy is he can really commands the room when he steps in because he's been, I think, a part of the if not the the leader. I get my facts straight. I'm going to find him when I when I do this. But he's been a part of some significant financial systems. I'm going to say it that way because I don't remember which ones it was. I think it was Bank of London or something. But and the other one was another big finance. Maybe the chat can help me out with that. But I'm going to look that up in a second. But he's he's a big deal before he's president here. And so when people when he speaks. He people listen to this guy. And so when he says, hey, our rules of order are broken. People wonder what's happening because remember, this is the guy.
51:45 I believe this was the guy that said that we're going into a new world order just last episode. I think I talked about this. And now he's talking about about that world order at the World Economic Forum. Check this out. It seems that every day. We're reminded that we live in an era of great power rivalry that the rules-based order is fading that the strong can do what they can and the weak must suffer what they must and this aphorism of Thucydides is presented as inevitable as the natural logic of international relations reasserting itself. Wow. Okay. So that's that's. Interesting, right? You can't you can't say that the rules of order are fading. That's essentially what he's saying here. Why is he saying that? Well, he's very upset with the United States president, even though he doesn't say the name of the president the whole time.
52:47 But you can see that there is he believes a rupture that is happening and America. He believes has become too powerful. Can you imagine? I mean if you live in America and you have your your neighbor that's so upset that they're both they're having their handshaking. With your enemies over something that the president said, it's a little bit stressed. It was stressed a lot of people out, especially in the politics. This is what he said next about that rupture. Let me be direct. We are in the midst of a rupture, not a transition over the past two decades. A series of crises in finance health energy and geopolitics have laid bare the risks of extreme global integration, but more recently great powers. Have begun using economic integration as weapons. Tariffs is leverage financial infrastructure is coercion supply chains as vulnerabilities to be exploited. You cannot live within the lie of mutual benefit through integration when integration becomes the source of your subordination.
53:57 That was a significant thing. He said there. Did you catch what he said in a little bit of crypto? Cryptics a way of saying it. Listen, he exploited. Listen, listen, you cannot live within the lie of mutual benefit through integration. You cannot live in the lie of mutual benefit through integration. What does that mean to live in the lie of mutual benefit through integration is it's like if you have a part of something. That you're supposed to be a part of but the cohesion with that thing that the rules that keep that together are not being abided by everyone. Everyone. What does that mean? Now, I'm not getting political here understand. I'm looking at this through a global worldview of the Bible. There has to be a time where all nations are angry at each other and we're beginning beginning to get to that point.
54:49 And I'm sure a lot of people even our grandparents thought at one time. Well that it was going to happen in World War One World War Two. Let me propose that that was a test of what's going to happen at the end of time. According to occultist World War Three is the war and I think we're getting to that point. So when he says things like this, hey, we're not happy with America. Everyone's ears should perk up. In fact, he says some pretty pretty bold stuff so much. So that everyone kind of gives a role in the audience and you kind of hear people go listen when integration becomes the source of your subordination. So in other words, you're you are. A submissive to the integration of something because you believe that this is how it works, but you're submissive of that. It's so cryptic that not everyone got it essentially, but it's very very very important what he said.
55:49 You cannot live within the lie of mutual benefit of integration when in when an integration becomes a source of your subordination. Boy, oh boy. So. Many companies. Companies are separating. They want their fragile right now and they're looking at every all the politics and going we need to reorganize. Could it be I'm just saying could it be there is a theory that goes in Revelation 17 that talks about. 10 Kings now I want you guys in the comments below. I want you to tell me what you think that means because I was looking it up and not everyone's very clear on that. There's also in parallel. 10 toes on the statue and Daniel 2. What do you think that means? Does it mean we're not quite in the 10 toes of the end of time yet?
56:41 It could be could be that these 10 Kings come together that have no I forget what they first says has no leader. This this is something that happens and their their time goes out for one hour prophetically. Could we be seeing the reordering of things into a new order that has those. Those those those 10 things happen. I don't know. I don't know but I'm watching this carefully because it's it's an interest me. And as a result many countries are drawing the same conclusions that they must develop greater strategic autonomy in energy food critical minerals in finance and supply chains. And this impulse is understandable a country that can't feed itself fuel itself or defend itself has few options. When the rules no longer protect you you must protect yourself. But let's be clear eyed about where this leads.
57:39 A world of fortresses will be poor more fragile and less sustainable. And there's another truth. If great powers abandoned even the pretense of rules and values for the unhindered pursuit of their power and interests the gains from transactionalism will become harder to replicate. And then he goes on and talks a little bit about calibrating the interests of the United States in not so many words. Now Canada was amongst the first to hear the wake up call leading us to fundamentally shift our strategic posture. Canadians know that our old comfortable assumptions that our geography and alliance memberships automatically conferred prosperity and security. That assumption is no longer valid. We are calibrating our relationships. So their depth reflects our values.
58:35 And we're prioritizing broad engagement to maximize our influence given and given the fluidity of the world at the moment. The risks that this poses and the stakes for what comes next. Okay. So what did he say there? He said basically Canada is calibrating its relationship with the United States with all superpowers. We're trying to set ourselves apart so that we can survive if something big happens and we have to separate. Because this whole world organization that's coming together. That was a part of this whole thing. You know, I have another video. I should start doing talking about the UN and the the what is this new Trump's group of truth that comes out. Wasn't that supposed to be United Nations at one time and now he now this is this other thing. It's really wild.
59:24 What's happening right now? Everyone's kind of separating into big groups. So Canada is building their defenses up there. There's. Their defense. Think about what that means. They're building their defenses up. In other words, if they have to go to war without somebody else without the United States or with the United States, they want to be ready for that. And they're spending on separating and joining. China. That's what he's going to say next. And we are no longer just relying on the strength of our values, but also the value of our strength. We are building that strength at home. Since my government took office. We have cut taxes on incomes on capital gains and business investment. We're doubling our defense spending by the end of this decade and we're doing so in ways that build our domestic Industries.
1:00:16 Okay. So listen, he's not just politicizing here. He's not saying hey, look how great I am. He's saying specifically weird. We're separating and we are getting our growing because we realize that. We're going to have to defend ourselves with our own defense and our own economy. And we are rapidly diversifying abroad. We've agreed a comprehensive strategic partnership with the EU including joining safe the European defense procurement arrangements. We have signed 12 other trade and security deals on four continents in six months. The past few days we've concluded new strategic partnerships with China and Qatar. We're negotiating free trade. We're doing tax with India ASEAN Thailand Philippines and Mercosur. We're doing something else to help solve global problems.
1:01:07 We're pursuing variable geometry. In other words different coalitions for different issues based on common values and interests on Arctic sovereignty. We stand firmly with Greenland and Denmark and fully support their unique right to determine Greenland's future. So essentially what he said here is his. How can you say something nicely to to the United States and being mean at the same time? I'm not exactly sure how to put that nicely, but that's essentially what he's saying in very very careful and calculated terms. Hey United States get out of here. We kick you out go kick rocks. I think is the term and and then the shocking quote is what he said here. Argue the middle powers must act together because if we're not at the table, we're on the menu.
1:02:05 Oh, listen to that again. Listen to that again. Argue the middle powers must act together because if we're not at the table, we're on the menu. But I'd also say that great powers great powers can afford for now to go it alone. They have the market size the military capacity and the leverage to dictate terms middle powers do not. But when we only negotiate bilaterally with a hegemon we negotiate from weakness. We accept. What's off. We compete with each other to be the most accommodating. This is not sovereignty. It's the performance of sovereignty while accepting subordination in a world of great power rivalry. The countries in between have a choice compete with each other for favor or to combine to create a third path with impact.
1:03:06 We shouldn't allow the rise of hard power to blind us to the fact that the power of legitimacy. Integrity and rules will remain strong if we choose to wield them together. The powerful have their power. We have something to the capacity to stop pretending to name reality to build our strength at home and to act together. That is Canada's path. We choose it openly and confidently and it is a path wide open to any country. It is a path that is open to anyone willing to take it with us. Thank you very much. Folks. We are in for quite a time. Someone asked in the chat. They said what is that map that shows the future territories or regions?
1:04:00 The world will be divided into and I was actually looking at that map too. I wasn't quite sure if I should put that in here because I you know someone is the there's some theory out there that says that this might be the map that everyone's dividing into. I don't remember the name of it. Maybe someone can remember the name of it, but I was looking it up. Just before I went live here and again, I try to keep everything legitimate here and I try to get it open as much as I can so that we don't say anything in error. But since someone mentioned it in the comments, this is kind of the end of the show talking a little bit about the comments. So I'm going to conclude it with this. I'm going to bring up that that that image thing was called the Oh, what was it? He has some acronym United Nations 10 territories. I'm sure Google can figure out what I'm. Talking about here. Candid territories.
1:04:50 Yeah, here we go. The 10 territories the regional groups. See if I can pull that up. From the UN. There it is. There it is. Okay. Let me bring that over here. You can kind of see. Oh, no. Well, that's not the right one. Let me see if I can bring this in here. So when my screens went crazy, it stopped me from being able to. Display what I'm showing you on this screen. It's called the sustainable development goals report. It was from 2019. It has regional groups. Still trying to figure out how to show you guys this. Give me just a second. I'm going to pull this up. Let's see here.
1:05:42 Shortcuts. Down to display one, two, three. Capture. It is. Display. One thing I don't like about this program is it seems to change the capture number desktops that we have. And then I don't know which one it is. So it's a little bit of annoying annoyance to me. There it is. Good. That was fast fix. Okay, so I'm gonna bring this up. See this. So this is the this from a long time ago. This is from a 2019 sustainable development goal report. Regional groups from and this is from the United Nations website. The idea is to have one, two, one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight. Now, this is there's an updated one where it kind of splits these different where it shows 10 different regions.
1:06:43 How to find it, but you get the idea that it looks as if there is groupings of of these territories that people will kind of be in. At least that's the idea for the end. Let me bring up that Revelation 17 part. And again, again, this is this is just reading the Bible and trying to piece things together. I'm not saying that this is how it is. But I do know that I looked it up earlier today and there's no specific. I'm not going against any anything on here. That is like, oh, well, you're this is not correct. Theology. This is we don't know what this is yet. This is. This Revelation 17 stuff. So I'm going to read it. Put it up on the screen. Hopefully we'll see.
1:07:35 Yeah, all these ads in that terrible. All right. So where's that part where it says 10 Kings? Yeah, there it is. 10 Kings the 10 the 10 horns. You saw are 10 Kings who have not yet received the kingdom but for one hour will receive Authority as Kings along with the Beast. They have one purpose and they will have power. They will give their power and Authority to the Beast. They will wage war against the lamb. You recognize that rage war against lamb. Well, that's Revelation 16. 14, right? So they were age war against land. So this is at the very end of time, but the lamb will triumph over them because the Lord is Lord of Kings and with him will be called those who are and and faithful followers. So this is significant. This is this is a part of the end of time that I think that we should we should delve into and look into heavily.
1:08:35 Let me look at your comments real quick. Brave browser help us ads. It sure does. If you look at my ads, you think that I'm going to retire soon. I don't know what the deal is giving me ads. Or things that hopefully I don't need soon. I don't know. Maybe it knows me better than I know me. Maybe I need to see. Looking looking looking. How's everyone doing with with the storm that went through? We had a big storm go through the the middle of Eastern America and I thought I was going to have some major issues, but everyone north of me got snow and I got rain as usual. So I had all my my my my generator already supposed to be 14 inches. We got a dusting and some rain. Four inches.
1:09:40 In New Mexico. Oh, wow. I see in Houston, Texas. Oh, wow. Dallas got hit bad with snow. That's interesting. 85 and warm in Florida. My wife wants to move to Florida. I was born in Orlando. I lived there. I remember the snakes and the scorpions. 8 to 68 inches in mid. Montana. A couple of. Feet of snow in Massachusetts. Wow, a couple of feet. Wow, that normal. 6 inches in Michigan. You guys get a lot more snow than 6 inches though. You got that Lake effect snow. We have to be Watchmen on the wall.
1:10:38 Kathy says absolutely. Absolutely. Last checked. We have 8 inches and 10 inches in South Illinois. Wow. Wow. Pennsylvania 12 to 14 inches. Lived in Tampa a bit. 2 feet in Pennsylvania. 5 inches in Kansas. Not normal for this season. Yeah. There's 24 hours in a day. Oh, yeah. Yeah, half a month. Oh, interesting. Oh, because that's the prophetic time period. For half a month. That's how much they have. So in other words, two weeks. Isn't there a part of the Bible that also says that there will be a quiet for an hour in heaven?
1:11:30 I forget what that is where all the angels leave and come and save extract harvest if you will humanity. I think that's fascinating because all the ufologists are like we're going to be harvested. We're not the biggest thing on Earth. Yeah, we're going to be harvested. Of course. We're going to be harvested. The Bible says so. Not not for eating though. We're not going to be eaten. Let me harvested. Putting into bundles. It's a beautiful weather here in Orlando. Extreme cold. Let's see. Five to seven here in OKC. So many I'm so much snow came through. Oh, it's half hour. You're right. You're right. John. Thank you so much for correcting me.
1:12:17 Yeah, it's a half hour and and grub says half hour out in heaven. So that would be a what is that half hour? So that would be like half of a full. Our quarter. I'm not sure I got to go back and look at. My my notes. 12 hours in a day. One hour equivalent a month. Very snow freezing from cast country Michigan. The snow storm is the same route as the Eclipse. What does that mean? Well, why does my honors keep disconnecting that keep losing everything? Okay. I think we're about done folks. Thanks for watching tonight. It's been a very interesting night to go over this stuff and takes time for me to put this stuff together and cut all these videos up for you guys to watch this stuff. So if you're interested in helping out, please join our patreon give us a hearty donation on strange rumble.org appreciate it and we will continue to monitor what's going on around the nation around the world.
1:13:28 So we know exactly what's happening. My name is Bradley. This has been pure strangeness and absolute normalcy strange normal. We'll see you next time. You're watching strange normal with the truth is the truth.